http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPtOm9UXfnU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gS-BziPW6FQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFG6W2_iiQE
—
During President’s week, the military and our two most recent Presidents
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIHz5tevLAw
Also posted at: http://www.armyparatrooper.org/dropzone/showthread.php/22772-How-Marines-wel
—
From: http://politicaloutcast.com/2014/02/people-trust-predict-global-warming/
“But These Are The People We Should Trust When They Predict Global Warming?
February 20, 2014
We get their mockery and their in-your-face wastefulness, but do they know what they are talking about (Of course not! They are liars with an agenda who believe that the ends justifies the means!—my additions)? How many times do the global warmists get to make false predictions before we’re allowed to stop listening to them (Never allowed! You just have to do it! We have forgotten how to take the initiative in this country! Or, are afraid to! I’m not sure which!—my addition)?
Bloomberg Businessweek reports,
‘Surprised by how tough this winter has been? You’re in good company: Last fall the Climate Prediction Center of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration predicted that temperatures would be above normal from November through January across much of the Lower 48 states (I had a meteorologist as one of my tax clients when I lived in Arizona. He told me that he doesn’t like to make forecasts beyond three days because it is too difficult to predict accurately what will actually occur the farther away from the current day. If that is true for weather, what is it like for climate? [climate is weather over a span of time.] So yes, climate changes over time! Climate change as used by the global warmists is a meaningless term! They think you are idiots! You are not, are you? Because you may be if you believe their continuous lies!—my addition). This graphic shows just how wrong the official forecast of the U.S. government was:
The story spends words pretending it is offering an explanation when all it is doing is re-stating the problem. It claims the cause of the miscalculation was:
Underestimating the mammoth December cold wave, which brought snow to Dallas and chilled partiers in Times Square on New Year’s Eve.
How can you offer as an explanation for underestimating the cold the fact that you underestimated the cold? That is not an explanation at all. Are they telling us that they just guess about whether or not there will be cold waves and they guess how cold or warm they will be (Pretty much!—my addition)? They never tell us they just got lucky when their predictions are correct, so I have to assume that there is a procedure they follow or are supposed to follow. In that case they could say something like, ‘We had an intern who was supposed to enter that part of the data, but he got drunk and skipped work that day and never told us.’ That would be an explanation. Instead, they are telling us that they underestimated how cold it would be because they thought it would be warmer. How informative (About all they can say?—my addition).
The story heaps report of ignorance on top of reports of ignorance. They can’t figure out why the polar vortex is lasting. Naturally, they could never predict such a thing. Then we have an affirmation that predicting the climate months in advance is nothing like the daily weather report (Absolutely correct!—my addition).
No doubt.
But since they are offering no explanations, I will give you my own guess.
Months-ahead climate forecasts are what Halpert calls ‘boundary-value problems.’ Instead of taking a snapshot of the quickly changing atmosphere, climate forecasters focus on things that change more slowly, such as temperatures of the land and oceans. The concept is that these enduring conditions will ‘force’ the daily weather in a certain direction. Climate forecasters can’t say when a storm might hit, but they try to say whether a given three-month period will be wetter, drier, hotter, or colder than average.
Fine. What is one of the supposed ‘enduring conditions’ that only a flat earther (Flat earth theory was accepted as much if not more than the current global warming lies! To call someone a flat earther is to acknowledge that theories CAN BE WRONG!—my addition) would dare refuse to consider?
You know what it is: global warming. The world is supposed to be heating up. So they were not going to predict a downward spike.
In fact, even if some suspected a much colder winter, I would wager they didn’t want the embarrassment of making the EPA look silly as it imposed new regulations. So they hoped that the weather would be warmer and published their incorrect estimate.”
“The best laid plans of mice and men often go wrong!” ~ Robert Burns
And global warming is not even close to being a best laid plan! To understand global warming follow the money and look for the control over others! Global warming nonsense is about control and is about money!
—
This is my two part suggestion to Tea Party groups, social conservatives, Constitutionalists, and anyone else who wants to save our Republic from the approaching destruction.
1) Run as many conservative candidates in as many Republican primaries as possible.
2) Then, run as many independent and/or third party candidates as possible in as many races as possible where we did not win the primary.
That is why I am working to get the Constitution Party on the ballot in Texas. If we get on the ballot, we will have two Congressional House candidates running and two State candidates running. Getting on the ballot is the first step. Winning elections is the second. Winning elections will grow the Party. The Constitution Party is much more in line with the Tea Party movement than is the Republican Party. And I have been involved with all three!
—
The Constitution Party of Texas website: http://cptexas.us/home
If elected to Congress, I will not, under any circumstances, vote for present Speaker of the House John Boehner to be Speaker of the House. I call on every Republican primary candidate running in Texas Congressional District 19 to publicly (in writing) make the same pledge. It would not be a bad idea for every Republican candidate running for the House of Representatives to give the same pledge. See my post at http://christiangunslinger3.blogspot.com on December 16, 2013 entitled “Speaker of the House John Boehner Attacks the Tea Party Again for Being Fiscally Responsible!”
—
If I am elected to the House, I will use the Constitution, as written, to do everything in my power to stop judicial tyranny! Will the other candidates pledge the same? I know our present Representative has NOT done everything possible to stop judicial tyranny! Why is that?
—
If elected to Congress, I pledge that I will do everything within my authority as a member of the House of Representatives to begin and complete impeachment proceedings against the President of the United States for violating the Constitution, the laws of the United States as passed by Congress, and his oath of office. I call on every Republican primary candidate running in Texas Congressional District 19 to publicly (in writing) make the same pledge. It would not be a bad idea for every Republican candidate running for the House of Representatives to give the same pledge.
—
Competition is good for the economy and competition is good for the Republican Party!!! Competition keeps Congressmen committed to we the people!!! Primary Republicans who do not support the Constitution as written.
The Constitution Party of Texas website: http://cptexas.us/home/
