http://video.foxnews.com/v/3401163917001/noah-faces-storm-of-criticism-over-religious-merits/
—
I received this from a friend who has a farm in Colorado and spends the summers there. Colorado rockslide:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qqpo7EK3Q0o
—
From: http://godfatherpolitics.com/14563/lesbian-denied-haircut-male-muslim-barbers/
“Lesbian Denied Haircut by Male Muslim Barbers
by Gary DeMar
March 1, 2014
This story’s from Canada. But don’t worry, before you know it, a similar thing will happen in the United States (I’m not sure about that. I’m not sure that the Left is willing to take on Muslims in the U.S.! They are a protected class you know!—my addition). It will be interesting to see how liberals and their willing judicial accomplices will respond (Won’t it though!—my addition).
‘Barbers in Toronto who refused to cut a woman’s hair have become the target of a human rights complaint, in a case that pits religious freedom against gender equality. When Faith McGregor went into the Terminal Barber Shop requesting a short haircut, she was told the shop only grooms men. The reason, co-owner Omar Mahrouk said, was that as a Muslim he could not cut the hair of a woman who was not related to him (What a silly religious requirement? Right? Since Christians will, she could not pick a Christian barbershop for this exhibition of power!—my addition).’
The barber appealed to his Islamic religious beliefs for the refusal. This would be similar to an orthodox Jew or Islamic butcher who refused to slaughter a pig because of specific religious requirements regarding handling certain unclean meats.
While the rejection was not because the woman was a lesbian, it raises the same types of issues since the refusal of service had to do with gender. Under Canadian law, ‘business owners aren’t supposed to discriminate based on gender.’ So what’s a Muslim barber to do?
Kind of makes you wonder why she picked this particular barber shop (Doesn’t it though! Makes one wonder why she didn’t just say: “Sorry, I didn’t know. I’ll go to another barbershop where there is no religious objection. I don’t want to cause you to violate your religious beliefs over a haircut I can get elsewhere.” So, why didn’t she say something like that?—my addition)? Of all the barber shops in Toronto, she goes to one that is known for its Islamic beliefs. The place has been in business (since—my addition) 1925 and no one has complained. Life goes on, even with the discrimination.
‘Its client list includes former prime minister Paul Martin and actor Woody Harrelson, who can be seen posing with the owners in a photograph on the shop’s website. Some are standing behind the barbershop’s owners, pointing out that there are women-only spas and gyms (Of course there are and for some unknown reason they are perfectly acceptable even though they specifically exclude one of the two sexes! Isn’t that strange? Do you think they will be able to keep out males who believe they are females?—my addition).’
If this woman doesn’t like an all-male barber shop, then let (her—my addition) go and open her own shop that only caters to lesbians. She’s free to do so (But why bother? This isn’t about “discrimination?” It is about power and using government to intimidate others to accept what homosexuals want!—my addition).
With the way the courts are ruling and the media are reporting on these types of issues, we’re going to see homosexuals purposely going to places of business to test the legal limits of these new laws (They are already!—my addition). The goal of the homosexual movement is to shut down all dissent. The next stop will be churches.
Because our courts have made the behavior of same-sexuality a special protected class, the rights of homosexuals trump religious freedom (Not actually! Only in rogue courts!—my addition).
In the past, federal law has protected people from having to go against their religious beliefs when it comes to employment. For example, the EEOC sued a trucking company when Muslim drivers were fired because they would not deliver alcohol to customers.
‘Star Transport, Inc., a trucking company based in Morton, Illinois (This is my hometown!—my addition), violated federal law by failing to accommodate two employees because of their religion, Islam, and discharging them, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit filed today. . . .
‘According to EEOC District Director John P. Rowe, who supervised administrative investigation prior to filing the lawsuit, ‘Our investigation revealed that Star could have readily avoided assigning these employees to alcohol delivery without any undue hardship (According to whom? Does EEOC run the company?—my addition), but chose to force the issue despite the employees’ Islamic religion.’’
The federal law protecting the Muslim drivers is no different from the Arizona law that Governor Brewer vetoed.
‘John Hendrickson, the EEOC Regional Attorney for the Chicago District Office said, ‘Everyone has a right to observe his or her religious beliefs, and employers don't get to pick and choose which religions and which religious practices they will accommodate (Unless it is Christian! Look at the cases, look at the religion, look at the result!—my addition).’’
Did you get that? ‘Everyone has a right to observe his or her religious beliefs.’ So why do employees have a right to exercise their religious rights but not owners of a business?
Should Muslim barbers be forced to cut women’s hair (Of course not!—my addition)? Should a Muslim butcher be forced to butcher a pig and other unclean animals (Of course not!—my addition)?
Our government has opened a very big can of worms.”
Contrary regulations, contrary enforcement, contrary rulings!
—
This is my two part suggestion to Tea Party groups, social conservatives, Constitutionalists, and anyone else who wants to save our Republic from the approaching destruction.
1) Run as many conservative candidates in as many Republican primaries as possible.
2) Then, run as many independent and/or third party candidates as possible in as many races as possible where we did not win the primary.
—
Competition is good for the economy and competition is good for the Republican Party!!! Competition keeps Congressmen committed to we the people!!! Primary Republicans who do not support the Constitution as written.
