A call to action for Christians from Ted Cruz:
From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mijtx5W7130
—
A pro-life “April Fools” joke
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9rymEWJX38
—
Guess Who?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HB3xM93rXbY
—
From: http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/04/03/another-prominent-scientist-dissents-fmr-nasa-scientist-dr-les-woodcock-laughs-at-global-warming-top-prof-declares-global-warming-is-nonsense/
“Another Prominent Scientist Dissents! Former NASA Scientist Dr. Les Woodcock ‘Laughs’ at Global Warming—‘Global warming is nonsense’ Top Professor Declares
By: Marc Morano - Climate Depot
April 3, 2014
Dr. Woodcock declared there was ‘professional misconduct by Government advisors around the world’ when it comes to man-made climate change claims. ‘The theory of ‘man-made climate change’ is an unsubstantiated hypothesis (True! They have good and consistent liars on their side!—my addition)’—water is a much more powerful greenhouse gas and there is 20 times more of it in our atmosphere (around one per cent of the atmosphere) whereas CO2 is only 0.04% (Minor detail to the alarmists!—my addition).’
‘When I ask the former NASA scientist about ‘climate change’ and ‘global warming’, he laughs.’
Another Scientist Dissents! Former NASA scientist Dr. Les Woodcock ‘Laughs’ at Global Warming—Top Professor Declares: ‘Global warming is nonsense (Yes, it is! Particularly, man-made global warming!—my addition).’
Emeritus Professor Chemical Thermodynamics Dr. Leslie Woodcock of the University of Manchester’s School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science and a former NASA researcher, dissented on man-made global warming. Woodcock declared there was ‘professional misconduct by Government advisors around the world’ when it comes to man-made climate change claims (Sure is! Follow the money!—my addition). Woodcock, who received his PhD from the University of London, (Full Bio here - les.woodcock@manchester.ac.uk) is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry, a founding editor of Molecular Simulation, and a recipient of a Max Planck Society Visiting Fellowship, has more than 70 published journal papers, explained: ‘The theory of ‘man-made climate change’ is an unsubstantiated hypothesis’—water is a much more powerful greenhouse gas and there is 20 times more of it in our atmosphere (around one per cent of the atmosphere) whereas CO2 is only 0.04%—‘Carbon dioxide has been made out to be some kind of toxic gas but the truth is it’s the gas of life (Yes, it is! Biology 101!—my addition). We breath it out, plants breath it in. The green lobby has created a do-good industry and it becomes a way of life, like a religion (In many cases, THE religion! Mother goddess earth!—my addition).’
Woodcock continued: ‘The temperature of the earth has been going up and down for (My deletion of a number that is not provable—my addition) years, if there are extremes, it’s nothing to do with carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, it’s not permanent and it’s not caused by us. Global warming is nonsense.’
‘If you talk to real scientists who have no political interest, they will tell you there is nothing in global warming. It’s an industry which creates vast amounts of money for some people (Follow the money!—my addition).’
‘The reason records seem to be being frequently broken is simply because we only started keeping them about 100 years ago. There will always be some record broken somewhere when we have another natural fluctuation in weather.’
‘Its absolutely stupid to blame floods on climate change.’
‘This is not the way science works. If you tell me that you have a theory there is a teapot in orbit between the earth and the moon, it’s not up to me to prove it does not exist, it’s up to you to provide the reproducible scientific evidence for your theory (Hurray! Yes, it is!—my addition). Such evidence for the man-made climate change theory has not been forthcoming (Nor can it be because it is not happening!—my addition).’
Woodcock was profiled in the Yorkshire Evening Post. Full text below. (Sic—my addition)
Excerpt via Yorkshire Evening Post – April 3, 2014: (Sic—my addition)
He doesn’t believe in ‘global warming’ and says ‘climate change’ is a meaningless term used as a sop by big business to create money.
…
Emeritus Professor Les Woodcock is one of them. When I ask the former NASA scientist about ‘climate change’ and ‘global warming’, he laughs.
‘The term ‘climate change’ is meaningless. The Earth’s climate has been changing since time immemorial, that is since the Earth was formed (My deletion of a number that is not provable—my addition) years ago. The theory of ‘man-made climate change’ is an unsubstantiated hypothesis [about] our climate [which says it] has been adversely affected by the burning of fossil fuels in the last 100 years, causing the average temperature on the earth’s surface to increase very slightly but with disastrous environmental consequences.’
‘The theory is that the CO2 emitted by burning fossil fuel is the ‘greenhouse gas’ causes ‘global warming’—in fact, water is a much more powerful greenhouse gas and there is 20 times more of it in our atmosphere (around one per cent of the atmosphere) whereas CO2 is only 0.04 per cent.’
‘There is no reproducible scientific evidence CO2 has significantly increased in the last 100 years.’
‘Anecdotal evidence doesn’t mean anything in science, its not significant.’
‘Events can happen with frequencies on all time scales in the physics of a chaotic system such as the weather. Any point on lowland can flood up to a certain level on all time scales from one month to millions of years and its completely unpredictable beyond around five days.’
‘We can go back to great floods and Noah’s Ark in the Middle East regions which are now desserts.’
‘The reason records seem to be being frequently broken is simply because we only started keeping them about 100 years ago. There will always be some record broken somewhere when we have another natural fluctuation in weather.’
‘Its absolutely stupid to blame floods on climate change, as I read the Prime Minister did recently. I don’t blame the politicians in this case, however, I blame his so-called scientific advisors.’
But surely most of the world’s leaders, scientific community and people in general can’t be wrong can they?
Professor Woodcock hits back: ‘This is not the way science works. If you tell me that you have a theory there is a teapot in orbit between the earth and the moon, its not up to me to prove it does not exist, its up to you to provide the reproducible scientific evidence for your theory.’
‘Such evidence for the man-made climate change theory has not been forthcoming.’
He adds: ‘It’s become almost an industry, as a consequence of this professional misconduct by Government advisors around the world, not just UK—you can’t blame ordinary people with little or no science education for wanting to be seen to be good citizens who care about their grandchildren’s future and the environment.’
‘In fact, the damage to our economy the climate change lobby is now costing us is infinitely more destructive to the livelihoods of our grand-children. Indeed, we grand-parents are finding it increasingly expensive just to keep warm as a consequence of the idiotic decisions our politicians have taken in recent years about the green production of electricity (Ouch! Also TRUE!—my addition).’
‘Carbon dioxide has been made out to be some kind of toxic gas but the truth is it’s the gas of life. We breath it out, plants breath it in. The green lobby has created a do-good industry and it becomes a way of life, like a religion. I understand why people defend it when they have spent so long believing in it, people do not like to admit they have been wrong.’
‘If you talk to real scientists who have no political interest, they will tell you there is nothing in global warming. It’s an industry which creates vast amounts of money for some people.’
‘Even the term ‘global warming’ does not mean anything unless you give it a time scale. The temperature of the earth has been going up and down for (My deletion of a number that is not provable—my addition) years, if there are extremes, it’s nothing to do with carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, it’s not permanent and it’s not caused by us. Global warming is nonsense.’
He adds: ‘Light bulbs are a good example of the contradiction with the green movement. Europe has outlawed the tungsten light bulb. Tungsten is a harmless metal, like gold, it does not react with anything and yet now, in the name of conserving energy, we have low energy light bulbs full of toxic chemicals, including mercury vapour, which is poisonous. If you smash a low energy light bulb, the advice from the Department for the Environment is to vacate the room for 15 minutes (That is government for you! Do not smash light bulbs is the lesson to take from this!—my addition) .’
Full article here.
Related Links:
The global warming movement continues to lose scientists, many formerly with the UN IPCC.
Green Guru James Lovelock on Climate Change: ‘I don’t think anybody really knows what’s happening. They just guess’ – Lovelock Reverses Himself on Global Warming
More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims – Challenge UN IPCC & Gore
Top Swedish Climate Scientist Says Warming Not Noticeable: ‘The warming we have had last a 100 years is so small that if we didn’t have climatologists to measure it we wouldn’t have noticed it at all’—Award-Winning Dr. Lennart Bengtsson, formerly of UN IPCC: ‘We Are Creating Great Anxiety Without It Being Justified’
‘High Priestess of Global Warming’ No More! Former Warmist Climate Scientist Judith Curry Admits To Being ‘Duped Into Supporting IPCC’ – ‘If the IPCC is dogma, then count me in as a heretic’
German Meteorologist reverses belief in man-made global warming: Now calls idea that CO2 Can Regulate Climate ‘Sheer Absurdity’ — ‘Ten years ago I simply parroted what the IPCC told us’
UN Scientists Who Have Turned on the UN IPCC & Man-Made Climate Fears — A Climate Depot Flashback Report —Warming fears are the ‘worst scientific scandal in the history … When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.’—UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.
‘Some of the most formidable opponents of climate hysteria include politically liberal physics Nobel laureate, Ivar Giaever; Freeman Dyson; father of the Gaia Hypothesis, James Lovelock—‘Left-center chemist, Fritz Vahrenholt, one of the fathers of the German environmental movement’
Flashback: Left-wing Env. Scientist Bails Out Of Global Warming Movement: Declares it a ‘corrupt social phenomenon…strictly an imaginary problem of the 1st World middleclass’”
Man-made global warming is just another man-made myth! And people talk about Christians living by faith! Believing in man-made global warming is putting your faith in liars and Charlatans!
—
Live Action
Every hour, the abortion industry ends the lives of four precious children. Think of the difference you could make with even one hour. Order and distribute The Advocate today.
PS: The Advocate is available to you for FREE. But, if you're able, you can help us cover the costs we incur on our end to bring you this pro-life resource. Please click this link, and make a 100% tax-deductible donation if you can.”
For a PDF of The Advocate: http://www.liveaction.org/files/advocate/advocate12.pdf
—
Update: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/gosnell-movie
$1,124,251USD raised 21 days left
raised of $2,100,000 goal
Fixed Funding
This campaign will only receive funds if at least $2,100,000USD is raised by its deadline. Funding duration: March 28, 2014 - May 12, 2014 (11:59pm PT).
$1,011,618USD raised 23 days left
$974,477USD raised 24 days left
$899,613USD raised 26 days left
$778,398USD raised 27 days left
$726,062USD raised 28 days left
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAAll1R29vs#t=133
—
This is my two part suggestion to Tea Party groups, social conservatives, Constitutionalists, and anyone else who wants to save our Republic from the approaching destruction.
1) Run as many conservative candidates in as many Republican primaries as possible.
2) Then, run as many independent and/or third party candidates as possible in as many races as possible where we did not win the primary.
—
Competition is good for the economy and competition is good for the Republican Party!!! Competition keeps Congressmen committed to we the people!!! Primary Republicans who do not support the Constitution as written.
