From: http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/michaelschaus/2013/10/28/common-core-teaches-second-graders-to-be-good-union-comrades-n1732453/page/full
“Common Core Teaches Second Graders to be Good Union Comrades
Michael Schaus
October 28, 2013
Aside from the obvious objections to allowing the creators of Healthcare.gov to get more involved in the education of America’s youth, a new reason to resist the creepily altruistic ‘Common Core’ curriculum has surfaced. New Common Core teaching materials instruct second graders that land owners are intrinsically evil, that business owners are inherently greedy, and Saul Alinsky radicals are the saviors of the everyman. (Besides—and I know this should seem pretty obvious—do you really want the architects of a 17 trillion dollar debt teaching our kids things like basic math [Why sure! Why not? What could go wrong? Is not top down always best? Is not one size fits all, always best? Who needs competition? We have the all knowing government on our side!—my addition]?)
According to Fox news, ‘a textbook company contracted to produce materials under Common Core State Standards is trying to teach students as young as second grade about economic fairness by praising unions, protests and labor leader Cesar Chavez, according to an education watchdog group.’
Cesar Chavez is one of the liberal movement’s most recent heroes to be considered ‘in vogue’; as was evidenced by Google’s decision to honor the Labor activist instead of Jesus last Easter Sunday. Chavez’s Saul-Alinsky-inspired-radicalism should put him firmly on the fringe of mainstream Americanism. (A great read on Chavez can be found here.) But, believe it or not, the textbook’s mention of Chavez is only a minor portion of the
In addition to reading a glowing biography of the Marxist labor leader, students will be asked to evaluate the ‘scales of fairness’ (Students in second grade now determine fairness? Do they know what fairness is? How are they going to test for fairness on an exam?—my addition) between wealthy landowners, and lowly [non-union] workers.
‘‘Fairness and equality exist when the scales are balanced,’ teachers are prompted to instruct the students. They are then supposed to ask the students whether both sides, as presented in the plan, are equal, providing a correct answer of ‘no’ in the teachers’ guide.’
See? According to Common Core standards, the fact that wealthy business owners have more than the people they hire, is ‘unfair.’ (Although, in all fairness, second grade might be the right age group for liberals to share their ideas. This could be an honest attempt to keep the left engaged with a demographic that has an equal grasp of market forces and economic theory [Ouch!—my addition].)
Although I have not flipped through the comprehensive list of teaching materials tied to this disturbingly Leninist interpretation of economic ‘fairness’, I can make a safe assumption that the impressionable second grade economists will not be taught about the prosperity generated by business owner’s wealth; or the natural fairness of private ownership and free market.
After all, it’s kinda tough to get a job from a poor farm worker who rents his property.
Economic theories, wealth creation, John Smith’s concept of private property, market forces, and Chavez’s radicalism aside . . . There is still a pretty big question regarding why second graders would need to wrap their young brains around the concept of labor unions and so called ‘scales of fairness (Whatever that is!—my addition).’ Quite frankly, putting any organized bureaucratic government agency in charge of disseminating such information to young children is chilling. And given the government’s tendency to view wealth creators merely as untapped tax-revenue sources, it’s unlikely that such lesson plans would be presented without anti-capitalistic bias(Obviously!—my addition).
Once again the common core standards illustrate a decidedly creepy intrusion of politics into education from the highest levels (And intentionally so!—my addition). While education has been largely consumed by leftist philosophies for some time, the danger of Common Core is that this absorption of political activism in the classroom will now be pushed from the Federal level . . . A painfully intense infringement on local control will await any districts that decide to adopt the Fed’s centrally planned concept of ‘education’ (The federal government has no constitutional authority to be involved n education! None!—my addition).
While Karl Marx is not yet required reading under the Common Core curriculum, this latest example of the Fed’s ideological intrusion into education should set off some alarm bells. Aside from the laughable notion that a greater Federal influence in local schools will benefit the system, it makes the perversions of our kids’ worldview that much easier.
And this, comrades, concludes today’s lesson on Common Core radicalism.(My use of red—my addition).”
—
From: http://weaselzippers.us/2013/10/31/more-common-core-indoctrination-the-people-must-obey-the-governments-commands/
“More Common Core Indoctrination: “The People Must Obey The Government’s Commands”
Wow, indoctrination tied up as instruction on possessives. This is reportedly part of the Common Core lessons for third graders so it applies to all schools employing those standards (See picture below!—my addition).
This is courtesy of Chris Sardegna. In case you question the above, Chris even provides the answer key and a teacher’s power point.
So third graders are learning:
—it is the President’s job to make everything fair (Number 4!—my addition)
—the people must obey the commands of government officials (Number 5!—my addition)
—the individual’s wants are less important than the nation’s well-being. (Number 6!—my addition)
Let’s try a new lesson on the use of the possessive.
Common Core’s instruction on possessives is atrocious indoctrination and Common Core’s ‘standards’ should be investigated and tossed.
There, now we did our homework for the day…
All the propaganda you will need in our schools today! Welcome to today’s public education!